The
first Sunday of Lent has passed, and with it the usual gospel reading of Jesus
being tempted in the desert. The parallels to the season are obvious: as Jesus
fasted 40 days, so should we; as Jesus
rejected material comforts, worldly power, and (I think) the need for others to
love him, so should we; as Jesus put his trust in God to feed him, to lead him
to the right place (not dominion), to love him without necessarily showing it,
so should we.
I
wonder how many, hearing that passage, appreciate the 'temptations' part of it.
I certainly don't. I hear about Jesus telling the devil, "no," to all
the powers in the world, and I think it's faintly laughable, as if any
right-minded person with an inkling of heaven would up and say, "why yes,
Satan, I would like to sell you my soul for all the powers of the world."
It's even a little melodramatic for me when the devil says, "for all of
these [powers and principalities] have been handed over to me, and I may give them
to whomever I wish." If that's true, part of me thinks, then where's God?
I
think more appropriately the thought of giving up one's essential self is
appalling to anyone, even the most die-hard atheist. Whether we believe in God
or not, most of us recognize something important and separate about ourselves.
I think it's unique, but even if one is not willing to go that far ("out
of seven billion people, there's got to be somebody like me!"), then there
still exists that thing about us that
makes us different than others. And that, called 'the soul' or any other name,
is something that nobody willingly surrenders.
Or
maybe people surrender it all the time. Those who do, I think, are called
'company men' or 'brown-nosers' or more appropriately 'sell-outs;' we identify
the same phenomena in 'gold-diggers' and prostitutes. Those people who inspire
contempt because on some level they are obviously a little less than fully
human in character--those people have surrendered their souls. Of course,
probably not as efficiently as they would have to Satan, whether he exists or
not. Jesus was offered all the powers in the world, and they only hope to gain
a little more money at the cost of their self-respect. But the sad joke about
those who sell their souls, for whatever, is that 'they' usually sell it
cheaply.
It's
good that Christianity has this season of renewal. Nearly every religion in the
world practices some form of fasting and meditation, and while a common
complaint of critics is that Christianity puts these things into manageable
little boxes ("oh, you only have to do it once a year? well, that's not
exactly a life change!"), it's meant more provide focus an education.
Psychologists have noted that things like a certain amount of self-denial, and
a form of meditation, and a feeling of being part of something bigger than
oneself, all conduce to being happier, more fulfilled people. Turning to Christ
requires all of those things, because frankly they are the building blocks of
any good relationship: sacrificing for the other, paying attention to them in
some way, and putting the relationship itself ('something bigger than either of
members of the relationship') ahead of oneself.
Returning
to the foundation of the relationship, once a year during this Lenten season,
is a way of learning to re-appreciate the other member of the relationship.
Like a husband and wife in a routine need a 'date night' (or a full-blown
second honeymoon), like two friends growing apart need a good chat, like a
person needs to occasionally return to his or her favorite pass-time, we all
probably need a chance to rekindle our understanding of Christ's role in our
life: how He modeled right behavior; how He loved us; how He suffered for us on
the cross; and how we are called to honor Him in our behavior. After all, the
Mass exists as a reminder of these things, but week after week is
routine...until Lent shakes it up and points directly back to the foundation.
The
Catholic Church has many connotations as an institution. Catholics tend to
focus on the efficient and effective charity, on the almost miraculous
maintenance of tradition, the excellent education and firm moral teaching, and
its universality. Others (it seems) tend to focus on the sexual abuse scandal
and the criminal way in which it was covered up, the undue influence it seems
to have in contemporary American politics, the moralizing and proselytizing
that seems cruel and judgmental, and the effective marginalization of women and
condemnation of homosexuals. Both views are probably all too true, and I am
often both proud and ashamed to be a Catholic. But both miss the mark.
The
Apostolic Church existed began as a way to provide a tangible thing so that Christians could have a
meaningful relationship with God--first through the apostles who knew Jesus,
then through their successors. The sacraments are a tangible way to experience
the love and sacrifice of Jesus. The ministry of the church should renew us the
way Lent renews us: by bringing us closer to God (and providing a means to
those scientifically proven benefits cited before). Ultimately, the Church
isn't important for what it teaches
so much--and truth be told, many so-called Church perspectives are merely
opinions from Catholic humans who happen to be priests--but rather for what it does: minister. And Catholics have a
responsibility for a personal relationship with God, as provided by the Church,
and with all the obligations a real relationship imposes. Showing up,
conversing, caring about the other, being the kind of person with whom the other
wants a relationship in the first place.
Too
often, I think, Christians end up surrendering their souls to their various
Churches. Having opinions and doing what one is told is sadly always easier
than a meaningful, give-and-take relationship that requires maintenance.
Separating oneself into a special little church clique, with the mutual support
of other people, is sadly always easier than pursuing a connection with
something largely intangible (which is the definition of something 'larger than
oneself'). Such easy surrenders are so because they provide self-importance.
But real relationships have no room for self-importance, and neither does
sainthood.
What
I heard in the gospel about the temptation in the desert was Jesus rejecting
all those things which would separate him from God. Material possessions,
worldly influence, self-importance: these things pull us away from the other at
the heart of a real relationship. Jesus' citing of scripture in his answer to
the devil indicates that he does not reject the offers because of their source,
but instead because he'd rather live
on 'every word that proceeds from the mouth of God,' and that everyone worship
God instead of him, and that God's love not be tested--because he is in a
meaningful relationship with God and that's the most important thing. What
brings us back to that model are the sacraments, the sacrifice, and the prayer
that the Catholic Church directs at Lent - not as a means to control but as a
way to to provide a tangible 'object' of the relationship.
It's
a marvelous institution for this reason. All the posturing, the positions, the
pride (however justified), and the sins (however appalling) are merely
secondary.
