Agnus Dei

I recently began reading The Lamb's Supper by Scott Hahn, an excellent and revealing exploration of the true and mystical significance of the Catholic Mass. He argues that the Book of Revelation in the Bible is an explanation and retelling of a Mass as well as a vision of the end of the world. In fact, he believes that these two events are deeply interconnected--even, to some degree, the same thing. Should you be curious as to why the Apocalypse and the Mass are mystically the same event, I recommend the book. Mr Hahn is much smarter than I, and much more articulate about his point than I could be in this blog. But I'll reference some salient points to indicate one area in which modern American celebrations of the Mass fail to properly reverence all that the Sacred Liturgy means.

The author begins by briefly recounting his own conversion to Catholicism, which occurred during the observation of a Mass. When he heard the congregation recite the Agnus Dei and then heard the priest respond during the Elevation, "This is the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world...," he realized that the format and the language of the mass itself is drawn directly from scripture, particularly the Book of Revelation. A protestant Biblical scholar at the time, he knew that the Gospel of John and John's subsequent apocalyptic vision--recorded in Revelation--particularly refer to Jesus by the title of "Lamb of God," and though Mr Hahn had previously condemned the Mass as a blasphemy, a "ritual that purported to 'resacrifice Jesus Christ,'" this scriptural fidelity caused him to reconsider.

But why the lamb of God? Tradition teaches that most Jews of Jesus' time, taking their cue from prophets who wrote that the coming Messiah would restore the "Kingdom of God," believed that the Christ would be a new David, a new Saul. The "New Israel" would be again a land of milk and honey, strong in its boundaries and renowned for its glory, as it was in Saul's day when the Queen of Sheba made her pilgrimage there (1 Kings 10). Such Jews were understandably upset when the so-called Christ, who claimed to be the Messiah and the Son of God, died ignomiously on a cross, leaving nothing but some cryptic sayings about rising from the dead and a gaggle of frightened followers. Yet Christian theology teaches rightly that the "New Jerusalem" isn't a stronger earthly kingdom were God's chosen people can be free from oppression, but rather an analogous spiritual kingdom where there is freedom from sin and corruption.

Think for a minute what a powerful point this is. The Bible begins the tale of humanity with a story that tells of man's fall from grace into sin. And that same sin is the root and origin of all misery. The sin of Cain caused him to be driven from his home; the sins of the Israelites in the desert of the Exodus caused the vast majority of them to be slaughtered; the sins of David caused him the great personal anguish recorded in the Psalms; the further sins of the Israelites caused the Babylonian captivity and a long passion of foreign oppression. Don't forget that the act of oppression is a sin in and of itself; it is the sin of the oppressor. The whole sordid history of the world, which saw the glory and decay of the Roman Empire, the Islamic Empire, the bloody democratic and nationalistic revolutions, Fascism, and today terrorism, is attributable to somebody's sin. Jesus' life, death, and resurrection frees us from the shackles of--though not the effects of--sin.

Therefore the true mark of Jesus' messianic effect is his role as sacrifice. Mr Hahn identifies this and cites it as the culmination and fulfillment of a long Jewish tradition of sacrifices. Throughout the Old Testament, Jews sacrificed to God as a core element of their worship. Able sacrificed a lamb to God, Abraham nearly sacrificed his son, Melchizedek offered bread and wine. Mr Hahn points out that the Hebrews are not alone in this, either: many other religions have ascribed a similar importance to sacrifice. "Man's primal need to worship God has always expressed itself in sacrifice: worship that is simultaneously an act of praise, atonement, self-giving, covenant and thanksgiving (in Greek, eucharistia)... So when Jesus spoke of his life as a sacrifice, He tapped into a current running deep...in every human soul" (26). To a Christian, it should be painfully obvious that the urge to sacrifice to God results from a deep human need to "make things right" with Him on a radical level: to praise God for creating and sustaining us; to lovingly give of ourselves back to Him in gratitude; to atone both for our great transgression in first turning away from him and for our daily specific transgressions.

Yet all our personal sacrifices cannot truly "make things right" with God. The opening story of the Bible makes it clear that by rejecting God's love and providence in the Garden of Eden, we have permanently stained ourselves with that sin. Practically, that original sin is visible in our specific sins, often committed despite our great efforts to be good and holy people. And so we recognize the need for a better sacrifice. This is not a new concept. Mr Hahn points out that during the original passover, the instructions specified a valuable lamb--one of certain age, one without physical defects. After all, the meaning of the sacrifice would be little if we sacrificed something worthless. For our sins and failings, though, only the sacrifice of Jesus good enough: the God-man, unstained by sin; completely undeserving of sin's reward, death. To properly praise God, to properly thank Him, and--perhaps most importantly--to properly atone for our transgressions, and thus be freed from the weight of our sin, we must (like the Jews during passover) offer a more perfect lamb. Only the Lamb of God Himself will do.

Jesus is, more than anything else, the Lamb of God. His role as the perfect sacrifice is the one thing that enables our communion with God and allows us to hope for eternal life. This sacrifice is what we Catholics re-enact at every Mass, reverently offering up again the perfect sacrifice for the praise of God and the forgiveness of our sins. Since while we bear the flesh of Adam and Eve on our bones we are tainted by their sin, our sacrifice must be constant--hence the need to reconstitute Jesus' sacrifice constantly. Our constant participation in the Mass (the Church recommends we attend every day, if we can) is extremely important. For God stands outside of time, and therefore to Him every moment in the world happens simultaneously, not in a single instant but over all eternity. That is why as humans we are never stagnant regarding God: we are either becoming closer to Him or further away with each action and thought we commit. The past does not factor into our current relationship with God except insofar as we can draw encouragement or discouragement from it; the future is the province of wishful thinking. The present, as C.S. Lewis observed, "is all lit up with Eternal rays." Thus the sacrifice on the altar at Mass is mystically, literally the same sacrifice that occurred on the hill of Calvary, and our worship is concurrent (and in community with) with the worship of the holy ones in the heavenly Jerusalem of John's vision in Revelations. At the Mass, our world literally touches heaven.

Christ, of course, was more than a sacrifice. Before his death, he was a leader, a healer, and a teacher. Now that he has risen, He is Lord and King of all creation. He is our brother and He is our friend. He is our sustenance, our "food for the journey." He has many titles appropriate to those roles: King of Kings, Prince of Peace, Bread of Life. Yet His most important role is always and forever that of the Lamb, is the sacrifice that finally reconciled us, God's chosen and beloved people, with God. The Mass celebrates above all this sacrifice and reconciliation. That is why, at the moment of the sacrifice, as we stand in the presence of God Himself and the whole of the Church triumphant, we chant or sing the Agnus Dei, repeating the words "Lamb of God" three times. To replace that title with a lesser one, like "Bread of Life," is to fail in reverence. Likewise, to make the tone of the Mass express more happiness at how much God loves us, or how great God is, than solemn and heartfelt awe at the magnitude of our offered sacrifice, is to fail in reverence. After all, Mass isn't something we Catholics do ourselves, nor is it something to which we can apply "artistic license." God does it for us; God invites us into his heavenly kingdom for that period of time. And our only guideline for how to act comes from John's vision in Revelation, which is resolved into the traditional rubrics of the Sacred Liturgy.

I'll conclude by saying that "reverence" does not exclude laughter or happiness. I think a deep joy mingles both with awe and with a deep sorrow regarding our sinful state when we are truly reverent. The external effect when we stand before God in church is, appropriately, one of solemnity; it then appropriately transitions to laughter, affection, compassion, spontaneous praise, and personalized, heartfelt prayer when we return to this physical world. The grace that attends our serious and awe-inspiring experience of God's presence leaves us prepared and able to be the joyous free lovers and servants of God--which is, after all, exactly what we were created to be.